No published ratio
Industry tables exist. NetProto does not reprint one as a specification.
Rib to wall ratio
Mark nominal wall, rib thickness, and cosmetic faces. DFM review comments on CAD. This page does not publish a rib-to-wall ratio.
Design guideline
A rib that is as thick as the wall makes a hot junction and a sink risk on the opposite face. This page owns the ratio question. It does not publish a number. The ribs page owns the feature.
Rib to wall ratio sizes the rib from the skin, not a table. It is the rib thickness versus the nominal wall. A rib as thick as the skin makes a hot junction and can sink the opposite face. Rib design owns the feature. Wall thickness owns the skin. Sink marks is the defect. DFM review needs both thicknesses.

This spoke owns the ratio question. NetProto does not publish a ratio as a specification. Gussets and fillets change the junction. The design guide hub lists every topic.
Roles
Stay here for the ratio question. Open a sibling for the rib feature, the wall, or the sink.
| Page | Use it for |
|---|---|
| Rib to wall ratio (this page) | Rib thickness versus the nominal wall |
| Rib design | The stiffening feature |
| Wall thickness | The skin you size from |
| Gussets | Triangles that are not full ribs |
| Fillets and radii | Root mass at the junction |
| Draft angle | Rib sidewalls need draft for release |
| Sink marks | The read-through on the opposite face |
| Uniform wall thickness | Even walls before you add ribs |
| Boss design | Posts that tie into ribs |
| DFM review | CAD check before steel |
Checks
Qualitative checks. No figure on this page is a NetProto specification.
No published ratio
Industry tables exist. NetProto does not reprint one as a specification.
Skin first
Set the nominal wall, then size the rib from that wall.
Junction is local mass
Root radius and a thick rib both add a hot spot.
Class-A faces matter
A sink on a show face is a different risk from a hidden cover.
Decision
Wrong: a second wall standing on the skin. Right: a thinner rib, a rounded root, and a marked cosmetic face.
RFQ
The quote can start from CAD alone. These notes make the ratio pass specific.
Nominal wall thickness on the ribbed face
Rib thickness, height, and spacing
Root radius at the junction
Opposite-face cosmetic class
Resin family, including glass fill
Boss or gusset tie-ins on the same wall
Related
Stay on this spoke for its question. Open a sibling for the neighbor topic or the CAD check.
The read-through on the opposite face.
Sink marksHow NetProto reads rib and wall on CAD.
DFM reviewFAQ
It is rib thickness compared with the nominal wall. A thicker rib stiffens more and raises sink risk. This page owns that tradeoff.
None. Industry tables exist. They are not a NetProto specification. Upload CAD so DFM review can comment on your wall, resin, and class.
The junction is locally thicker than the skin. That mass cools slowly and can pull the opposite face. The sink article owns the defect.
A fillet spreads the junction mass and reduces stress concentration. It does not eliminate sink risk if the rib is much thicker than the wall. Open fillets and radii for the root geometry.
Filled grades change shrink and stiffness. They do not create a published NetProto ratio. Name the family on the RFQ.
This spoke owns the ratio question. Ribs owns the feature: height, draft, spacing, and boss tie-in. DFM review checks CAD.
Show nominal wall, rib thickness and height, root radius, and opposite-face cosmetic class. Upload CAD so DFM review can comment before quoting.
Next step
Share the wall, the ribs, and cosmetic faces so review can comment before quoting.