Zirconia or alumina
- Hardness and wear resistance no plastic comes close to
- Stays stiff and insulating at temperatures that would melt any resin
- Brittle, so drops and point loads need care in the design
Process guide
CIM follows the same road as metal injection molding, from powder and binder to a sintered part. The difference is where it ends: a hard, brittle material that cannot bend to hide a flaw.
Same route, less forgiveness
The furnace does not repair anything. It only reveals it.
The stages match MIM: feedstock, a molded green part, binder removal, then sintering to full hardness. A metal part can hide a small void or a weak knit line, because metal yields a little before it breaks. A fired ceramic has no such margin. Whatever went wrong in the mold tends to come out of the furnace as a crack.
So most of the engineering effort on a CIM part goes into the green state. Gate position, fill pattern, and how the part is picked off the core decide the yield long before anyone opens the furnace.
Materials
Two oxides cover most of the work.
| Material | Why it is chosen | Typical parts |
|---|---|---|
| Zirconia | Tough for a ceramic, polishes to a high gloss, tooth colored grades | Orthodontic brackets, fiber optic ferrules, watch cases, blades |
| Alumina | Very hard and electrically insulating, the workhorse among technical ceramics | Insulators, thread and wire guides, wear pads, sensor bodies |
| Translucent alumina | Lets light through after careful sintering | Lamp tubes, clear orthodontic brackets |
Defects
Each of these can look harmless on a green part.
Knit lines where two flow fronts meet, which fire into weak seams
Voids and sink inside heavy sections, which open up during binder removal
Powder and binder separating near the gate, leaving a zone that shrinks differently
Ejection stress on a fragile green part, leaving microcracks that show only after firing
Uneven sections that trap binder and then crack or bloat in the kiln
Tooling and finishing
Ceramic wears the equipment on the way in and resists every tool on the way out.

Alternative
Ceramic is chosen for hardness and heat. When the job is really insulation or light wear, PEEK or PEI is often enough.
FAQ
The route is the same. The powder is ceramic instead of metal, it is fired at higher temperatures, and the finished part is brittle. That makes molding defects far more costly, and it makes finishing slower because only diamond tools cut it.
Firing shrinks the part a lot, and tiny variations in that shrink limit how closely it holds size. Features that need better than that are ground or lapped with diamond afterward.
Orthodontic brackets, fiber optic ferrules, watch parts, insulators, textile thread guides, and small wear parts in pumps and valves. The common thread is a small, detailed part that needs hardness or heat resistance.
No. NetProto's production path is thermoplastic injection molding. This page is a reference for engineers deciding whether a part truly needs ceramic, and a PEEK or PEI version can be quoted from CAD.
Keep reading
The metal version of the process and the plastics that take on ceramic jobs.
The shared powder and sintering route.
Metal injection moldingHeat, wear, and chemical resistance in a plastic.
PEEKStiffer and harder wearing than plain PEEK.
Carbon fiber PEEKInsulating and flame resistant.
PEI (Ultem)Choosing between the two.
PEEK vs UltemMolded plastic parts for devices and instruments.
Medical and dentalEvery molding process and secondary operation.
Processes hubNext step
Upload CAD with the temperature, wear, and electrical requirements. The review looks at PEEK, PEI, and filled grades on a standard injection mold. NetProto manufacturing is ISO 9001 certified.